Historical Literacies Module
~ A Module for Learning ~

Welcome to the Drew Writing Project/NEH Grant “Building a More Perfect Union” workshop series on Artifactual and Historical Literacies!
By the end of the module you should be able to:
- Define historical literacy.
- Define historical thinking.
- Use support tools to read objects and texts to activate historical thinking skills.
- Articulate how historical literacy allows one to have a deeper understanding of the world around them.
Prior to getting settled, please download a copy of this organizer or a journal for writing.

Introduction to Historical Literacy

Start a 1-minute timer and then make a list of as many details as you can about the object in this picture. Consider the following questions as you describe:
- What is it?
- What are its parts?
- What is its purpose?
- Who might have owned it? When? Why?
- Would it be useful today?
- Has it evolved?
- What does it mean to you?
The telephone is an example of an innovation that changed the trajectory of history, and with each iteration, the ways humans existed shifted. How many iterations of the telephone have you experienced? How did your life change with each one? Was the change in the phone the only reason your life changed?
You have just demonstrated skill in one element of historical thinking: Causality.
- Understanding causality allows you to trace threads that connect historical moments. Deep understanding of causality in historical thinking leads to awareness that there is never just one cause that leads to an outcome.
Now let’s look at a second element of historical thinking: Contingency.
Now let’s look at a third element of historical thinking: Context.
- Did you know that there are people who have never seen a smartphone? Looking at this data map, how might you deepen your understanding of what life without a smartphone might look like beyond your personal context? If you have time, read the full article to go even deeper into this thinking.
The ability to use historical thinking skills in order to think critically about the world around us is historical literacy. Watch this video to hear more about it.
Make a connection to your life experiences, a current event, or your knowledge of history using one or more of the 5C’s mentioned in the video or detailed in the Historical Literacy Infographic.
Developing Historical Literacy
Important: We develop historical literacy by learning how to read primary and secondary sources, including images, videos, and objects, with a critical lens. For more information on primary and secondary sources, feel free to consult or consult this research guide from the University of Massachusetts.
Let’s apply historical thinking while we examine an object from the Museum of Early Trades and Crafts in Madison, NJ. What is this object?


Answer:
This is a printing press! If you don’t know what this object is, check out the Wikipedia article for more information.
Look closely at the pictures. Use your imagined five senses to observe the details of the object. What do you notice?
Now, go back to the details that you noticed and zoom out to the bigger pictures. What do you wonder about this object? Make a list of questions. There are no right or wrong questions. Ask anything that comes to mind.
Let’s use historical thinking to read this object. Watch this video that explains the historical reading skills outlined in the following chart.
Historical Reading Skills | Questions |
Sourcing Ask the who, what, where, when, and why of the object. | – Who made this object; did they make it for themselves or for someone else? – Is this object man-made, manufactured, or natural? – When was this object created and/or found? – Where was this object created and/or found? – Why was this object made and for what purpose? – Is the object authentic or a replica? How do you know? |
Contextualization Consider the setting during which the object was utilized and how it influenced its time, space, and place. | – When and where was the object made? – What were the circumstances of the time that impacted the object’s construction/use? – Was this object made with a purpose? – What societal changes prompted the need for the object? -What predated the object? Has it been replaced with something else? – How might the circumstances in which the object was made/used affect its material construction? – How does the object play a role in the events of the time? |
Corroboration Examine the object against other sources and objects so that its authenticity can be tested; using multiple texts allows an individual to see multiple points of view. | – Is this object part of a collection? – What do other sources reveal about the object? – What do other sources add to your understanding of the object? – Are there other objects similar to it in form and function? – What sources confirm the authenticity of the object? |
Close Reading Take a closer look at the object by bringing in outside information and examining for clues that may connect to a person, time, or culture. | – What are the material qualities of the object? (Use your senses to determine.) – How many people used this object, and in what way(s)? – Does its creator impact the object’s value? – Does its former or current owner determine its value? – What story does the object tell? – How does this object differ from others like it? What makes it unique? |
Use the questions from each section of the Historical Reading Skills chart to interrogate the text about the printing press.


“Washington Printing Press
The Washington Press, manufactured from 1829 to 1910, was the most successful and popular iron hand-printing press in America. It was named in honor of the first American president by its inventor Samuel Rust. A New York printer and sometimes grocer, Rust, in 1821 improved the existing iron press of his day by designing a superior toggle that quickly and easily applied a lot of pressure on the plates. Then in 1829 he patented a frame design which was both stronger and lighter than competing models and importantly could be easily disassembled for shipping.
Rust’s competitor, R. Hoe & Co. recognized that his press was better than theirs and made several unsuccessful attempts to buy the patent rights. Finally in 1835 Rust was tricked into selling. A man came to Rust claiming that he had left the Hoe company and wanted to beat them at their own game. Rust thinking he had found a kindred sprit sold out to him for $3000. The buyer who had never really left Hoe turned around and passed the rights to them. R Hoe [ ] manufactured the Washington Press – including the Museum’s press which they built in [ ] into the next century.“
“Pulling the Devil’s Tail
The typesetter has to read and have nimble fingers, but not great strength. Once, however, had to be quite strong to operate a press, particularly a wooden one, and some apprentices never developed enough to do it. Printer were recognizable by the large muscle’s they developed on just the right side of their body from pulling the devil’s tail (the press’s handle).“
Sourcing
- Who made this object; did they make it for themselves or for someone else?
- Is this object man-made, manufactured, or natural?
- When was this object created and/or found?
- Where was this object created and/or found?
- Why was this object made and for what purpose?
- Is the object authentic or a replica? How do you know?
Contextualization
- When and where was the object made?
- What were the circumstances of the time that impacted the object’s construction/use?
- Was this object made with a purpose?
- What societal changes prompted the need for the object? What predated the object? Has it been replaced with something else?
- How might the circumstances in which the object was made/used affect its material construction?
- How does the object play a role in the events of the time?
Corroboration
- Is this object part of a collection?
- What do other sources reveal about the object?
- What do other sources add to your understanding of the object?
- Are there other objects similar to it in form and function?
- What sources confirm the authenticity of the object?
Close Reading
- What are the material qualities of the object? (Use your senses to determine.)
- How many people used this object, and in what way(s)?
- Does its creator impact the object’s value?
- Does its former or current owner determine its value?
- What story does the object tell?
- How does this object differ from others like it? What makes it unique?
Bring it Together! What do you understand about this object now that you have interrogated it? What questions still remain? How might you uncover answers to your questions?
See it in Action! Watch as Lauren describes her process of thinking about the printing press when she first encountered it. *Notice how Lauren uses historical thinking as she asks questions about the artifact.
What did you learn from Lauren’s interrogation of the printing press? How does her interaction with the object inform your own understanding?
Moving from Objects to Written Texts
We can analyze texts with a tool called H.I.P.P.O., which is commonly shared in AP training.

For example, look at the following object, in this case an advertisement from a runaway apprentice found in the Museum of Early Trades and Crafts.
“It was not uncommon for apprentices to run away from their masters. There were many reasons for this, including restlessness, mistreatment and the lack of interest in the trade. Some apprentices left after realizing the with downturns in the economy, too many other apprentices, or technological advancements there would be limited call for the trade they were learning. Sometimes masters would offer large amounts for the return of their valuable apprentices but often the runaway notices were meant to simply make it hard for the apprentice to find a position elsewhere.”
“An Old Pelt Reward.
Ran away, a few days since an apprentice Boy name BARNABAS REDMAN, of about 19 1/2 years old, an ill-looking fellow, of a forbidding continence, clumsy in his address and deportment, of a morose aspect, much pitted with the small pox, bandy legged, and ill bred, having had his origin in the American army. Whoever will deliver said run away to the subscriber in Elizabeth Town, shall have the above reward.”
“N. B. The Printers in the United States, who would wish to discountenance runaways, will obliged a Brother Type by inserting the above in their respective papers. Any person harbouring or employing said boy will be prosecuted with rigor, and be considered an enemy to the welfare of printing. May 14, 1793.”
Paragraph Example:
“The document __________________ was found within the exhibit on the printing press in the Museum of Early Trades and Crafts in Madison, NJ. The historical context of the document shows….From reading the document, the intended audience for the document most likely is…After reading the document further, it is clear that the purpose of the document was…and was written from the perspective of… After reading the document it shows….The document can also be connected to the …. Because…”
Bringing it All Together
How can developing historical literacy deepen your understanding of the world around you? How can objects or artifacts help with the development of historical literacy?
Please fill out this form once you have completed the module. PD certificates are available.
Additional Resources
Access the Historical Thinking chart.
Works Consulted
- Andrews, Thomas, and Flannery Burke. “What Does It Mean to Think Historically? | Perspectives on History | AHA.” Perspectives on History: The News Magazine of the American Historical Association, American Historical Association, 1 June 2007, www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/january-2007/what-does-it-mean-to-think-historically#:~:text=In%20response%2C%20we%20developed%20an.
- Mandell, Nikki, and Bobbie Malone. Thinking like a Historian : Rethinking History Instruction : A Framework to Enhance and Improve Teaching and Learning. Madison, Wis., Wisconsin Historical Society Press, 2007.
- Printing Press Exhibit. “R. Hoe & Co. NY Printing Press. 2022. Private Collection, Museum of Early Trades and Crafts, Madison, New Jersey.
- Stearns, Peter N. “The Challenge of “Historical Literacy” | Perspectives on History | AHA.” Perspectives on History: The News Magazine of the American Historical Association, 1 Apr. 1991, www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/april-1991/the-challenge-of-historical-literacy.
- “Teachinghistory.org.” The Connection between Literacy and History, Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University with funding from the U.S. Department of Education, 2011, teachinghistory.org/nhec-blog/25172.
- “What Is Historical Thinking?” Teachinghistory.org, Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University with funding from the U.S. Department of Education, 2011, teachinghistory.org/nhec-blog/24434.
About the Authors
Lauren Sherburne, M.S.Ed, is currently a teacher consultant for the Drew Writing Project. She has been a teacher of Social Studies at the Morris Hills Regional District for the past 23 years as well as an instructional coach. Mrs. Sherburne is trained in Advanced Placement United States History and AVID. She has been a guest lecturer in Teacher Education program at Drew University, where she is pursing her Doctor of Arts and Letters in teaching writing and historical studies.
Kristen Hawley Turner, PhD, started her career in education almost 25 years ago as a high school history and English teacher. She is currently Professor and Director of Teaching Education at Drew University in New Jersey. Her research focuses on the intersections between technology and literacy, and she works with teachers across content areas to implement effective literacy instruction and to incorporate technology in meaningful ways. She is the co-author of Connected Reading: Teaching Adolescent Readers in a Digital World and Argument in the Real World: Teaching Students to Read and Write Digital Texts, and editor of Ethics of Digital Literacy: Developing Knowledge and Skills across Grade Levels. She is also the founder and director of the Drew Writing Project and Digital Literacies Collaborative.